Hair restoration technology has come a very long way over the years. Among the most advanced hair transplant systems available today are the ARTAS® and NeoGraft® hair transplant systems. These state-of-the-art devices offer precision and efficiency in hair transplantation unlike ever before. So what exactly sets them apart?
If you’re exploring hair transplant options, it’s important to know your options. Understanding the difference between ARTAS and NeoGraft can help you make a more informed decision about which procedure will work best for your needs.
Similarities Between ARTAS & NeoGraft Hair Transplant
Before comparing the differences between the two hair transplant systems, let’s understand their foundation: follicular unit excision (FUE). Both systems use follicular unit excision, previously known as follicular unit extraction, for the procedure. FUE is a modern hair transplant method that involves harvesting individual hair follicles from a donor area (typically the back or sides of the scalp) and implanting them in thinning or balding areas. This technique avoids the linear scarring associated with traditional strip methods and offers a quicker recovery time.
Benefits of FUE:
- No linear scar
- Faster healing compared to strip surgery
- Natural-looking results
- Ideal for short hairstyles
Both ARTAS and NeoGraft are built upon the FUE technique and have been FDA-approved, but that’s where the similarities end. Both systems use different tools and technology to perform the procedure, which we’ll dive into next.
What Is ARTAS Hair Transplant?
ARTAS® is a cutting-edge robotic hair restoration system that leverages artificial intelligence and image-guided robotics to assist in the extraction of hair follicles. It’s one of the most sophisticated and technologically advanced devices to be introduced into the field of hair restoration surgery. While NeoGraft was the first device ever used for hair transplant surgery, ARTAS utilizes better technology, which has also been FDA-approved.
Key Features:
- AI-powered follicle selection: Identifies optimal grafts based on angle, direction, and density.
- Robotic precision: Reduces human error during extraction.
- Real-time digital mapping: Tracks and analyzes each hair follicle in motion.
- Minimized graft trauma: Gentle harvesting protects follicle viability.
- No linear scarring: Ideal for patients who wear short hairstyles.
Best For:
Patients looking for the most technologically advanced solution and consistent results with minimal manual involvement. It’s ideal for those who prioritize precision and efficiency.
What Is NeoGraft Hair Transplant?
NeoGraft® was the first handheld surgical device approved by the FDA for hair transplants. This mechanized FUE system utilizes pneumatic pressure (suction) to extract and implant hair follicles. While it isn’t fully robotic like ARTAS, it offers enhanced speed and efficiency compared to traditional manual FUE methods.
Key Features:
- Handheld device: Controlled by a trained specialist.
- Suction-based extraction: Reduces the need for scalpels and stitches.
- Efficient harvesting: Can be faster in some clinical workflows.
- No linear scarring: Ideal for patients who wear short hairstyles.
Best For:
Patients who prefer a more hands-on approach, are looking for a device that has been used for decades, or want a cheaper option.
ARTAS vs. NeoGraft: Side-by-Side Comparison
ARTAS |
NeoGraft |
|
System Type |
Robotic-assisted | Manual handheld |
Cost |
$7,000 to $18,000 | $8,000 to $10,000 |
Precision |
High, AI-guided robotic arm | Depends on technician skill |
Invasiveness |
Minimal | Minimal to moderate depending on technician |
Scarring |
No linear scar | No linear scar |
Procedure Time |
4-8 hours | 8-10 hours |
Extraction Method |
AI follicle mapping and robotic harvest | Pneumatic pressure suction |
Operator Involvement |
Minimal (robot-controlled) | High (technician-controlled) |
Graft Survival Rate |
Maximum due to precision robotics | Variable due to manual harvesting |
Transection Rate
|
Least | Highest |
Recovery Time |
1 to 7 days | 1 to 7 days |
Ideal For |
Patients seeking precision and consistency | Patients seeking a hands-on, flexible approach |
Which Hair Transplant Is Right for You?
While NeoGraft was the first device ever used for hair transplant surgery, it isn’t the only or even the best device available today. Newer systems with better technology have since been approved by the FDA, such as the ARTAS robotic hair transplant system. While there are different devices available that claim to provide the same results, the truth is that ARTAS outperforms NeoGraft, SmartGraft, and older handheld devices. The key difference is that NeoGraft and SmartGraft are handheld devices that require the doctor to manually perform the hair transplant, while ARTAS uses precision robotics for unparalleled accuracy and results.
Both ARTAS and NeoGraft are excellent FUE systems, but your best option depends on your personal goals, your hair type, and the level of comfort you have with robotic vs. manual systems. While we always recommend ARTAS to our patients at Tampa Bay Hair Restoration since it’s the same price, some patients may lean towards NeoGraft at other hair transplant centers due to it being the more affordable option. We recommend looking into pricing throughout the country and consider traveling out-of-state for an experienced doctor who offers ARTAS iXi hair transplants.